It’s incredible how willing people are to pontificate on subjects they know absolutely nothing about. Such opinions tend to come from people who aren’t particularly successful and aren’t having their work stolen frequently. Confirming a story isn’t original reporting. The inability to spot or condemn unethical behavior is one of the reasons the Review-Journal and others continue to act unethically. I was going to delete the comment, but it’s illustrative of the profoundly stupid logic the RJ uses, and sometimes people need to hear the stupidity for themselves to help understand how engrained the problem is.
]]>I think you may have hit a nerve with Inquiring Mind.
]]>Agree with Rock Black. I lived in Vegas when the Rio was built and was phenomenal. Buffet was the best in the nation. Now it’s a shadow of what it was. Bring the buffet back and people will come back. Plain and simple. I won’t go back in there until they do
]]>Danny Gans, the wonderful #1 buffet, they did it to themselves! Turn it into a homeless shelter for tren de aragua!
]]>If you get a story from another source, you’re obligated to share the source of the original reporting. Scoop is currency. Pretty straightforward.
]]>